by Herman B. HayesMark Foley has put the Republican Party in a bad position, but I am sure that not all the blame can be rested on him alone.
In my opinion, Mark Foley is a victim here. He has been victimized by the “teenage boys”, a priest, and the Democrats. We know this is a Democratic ploy to hurt conservatives in the month before an election. That much is obvious. I think there is something a bit more sinister than that going on here, though. Something is not right about Mark Foley trying to have sex with children, beyond trying to have sex with children.
I am blaming a good portion of this on the pages in question. Why are they hiding from us? Is it because they are in their 50’s and chatting online in their donkey print pajamas? Chances are that Mark Foley was having internet sex with Howard Dean.
This smells of a liberal sting operation, and I know it has been in the works for years now. I want to see these “children” on the news this evening. If they are so sweet and innocent, surely there is no reason to hide them behind a veil of secrecy. I want to see them, I want to know that they are not full-grown liberal hit-men on a mission to take down Mark Foley and the House leadership. On the topic of Hastert, of course he should not step down. Someone handed him some emails that seemed “overly friendly”. Is being nice a crime? It is not like they brought him a box full of severed heads found in Foley’s office.
If they are really children, then the dirty little sluts had it coming. Much like many other situations, sometimes the victim gets what they asked for.
Children of that age are not really children, mind you. Sixteen year olds may have heard about sex from evil liberal teachers, or may have even heard about it from the children of liberal parents. Mark Foley is a man of weak moral character, and it is obvious that he was susceptible to the sexual assault launched upon him by these “innocent children”. “I have a package for you,Congressman”, can only be read one way when you are a man like Foley. That way is, of course, “I would like to have internet based sexual activity with you, Congressman. Oh, here is that package from FedEx you so lustfully desired, in the same way I know you desire my penis. I want you too, Senator Sexy-Pants.”
Come on, Foley, you can do better than “I was molested by a priest.” Try replacing priest with “Democratic councilman from my hometown”, and it will be a little more helpful to us.
“Molested by a priest” is the second oldest one in the book, right after “the devil made me do it”. The priest thing is so very over-used as an excuse for having a weak moral character. Oh, and of course it is a lie, since priests are men of God and do not do things like that, ever. You are simply joining hundreds and hundreds of other liars with no credibility. No one is biting, Mark, and you really are not helping our situation. You need to attack some liberals here, even if your attacks are all lies. Help spread the blame around. Soften the blow, if you will. I know that it would be difficult for you to hurt your real party like that, but you should at least try.
You did read that right. Mark Foley is a closet homosexual, and that makes him a closet Democrat.
It is not possible to be a homosexual and be a Republican at the same time. Our Good and Holy God does not allow such abominations to roam the Earth. Foley was, probably unbeknownst to himself, a Democratic operative, out to do major damage to the Republican Party. We need to stop this baseless smear campaign before it goes any further. There is nothing to see here, folks, move along. I hear that there are some Democrats planning to kill some babies. They are calling it “abortion”. Get yourselves all up in arms about that, instead.
Mark Foley was a weak willed closet Democrat-sexual who was either led on by predatory children, or was tricked by liberal smear-merchants. Either way, remember, more Democrats than Republicans will be taking “pages” from Foley’s now-available little black book.