Friday, June 30, 2006

Al Qaeda Judicial Squad

by Herman B. Hayes

On 6-29, America was attacked by terrorists. Jihad has struck at our shores once again.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided in a 5-3 ruling that our guests at Guantanamo Bay could not be tried in military tribunals. I went outside when the ruling was announced on CNN, just to see if I could hear the forces of terror cheering. I could, and the nine loudest cheers came from within the Supreme Court itself.

Apparently cherry-picking a Supreme Court does not guarantee you as much as it used to.

Our great and holy President Bush has done his best to keep this nation safe. Mr. Bush has personally gone after the forces of terror in Iraq, in a series of lightning in-and-out raids. He has championed the Patriot Act, which essentially outlaws the vile free speech required to be a terrorist. Furthermore, he hand picked two Justices for the Supreme Court, and made sure that august body would vote the way he, President Bush, saw fit. I guess you can’t even trust your good personal friends these days.

Five plus three equals nine, if you are an idiot.

Now, Conservatives for American Values should be your only news source. Since I am sure that you have not heard about this anywhere before, let me break down this ruling for you. Five Justices voted to support the terrorists: Stevens, Breyer, Ginsberg, Souter, and Kennedy. Voting to support freedom and Jesus were Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. The Oh-so-extremely Honorable Chief Justice Roberts recused himself due to prior involvement in the matter. So, which Justices should we send to Gitmo for supporting terrorism?

We should Guantanamize each and every one of them.


My reasons are very simple, but in case your minds are simpler, I will explain. My logic is clear for the five of them who voted in favor of killing American woman and children. Why would we incarcerate Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, though? They seem to be the ones who do not want to see dead Americans stacked like cordwood. To put is as gently as I can: They are hellbound cowards of the worst kind. The three dissenting Justices should have attacked and disabled the five-person Al Qaeda Judicial Squad before they could carry out this vicious terrorist attack on our nation. “But what about Roberts, what did he do?” you ask.

It is more a matter of what John Roberts did not do.

He could have stopped this mess before it ever started. First off, he should not have recused himself from this decision. He is the Holy Leader of the Supreme Court. He had the power that God granted him, and he failed to use it. His vote, plus a little persuasion, could have prevented 6-29 from ever happening. It would have been a simple matter for Chief Justice Roberts to convince a weaker Justice, such as the female Ginsberg, to vote in the proper manner. I would have suggested using some of the same persuasion techniques that we have honed so well at Guantanamo Bay. I guess he will get a little more first hand experience in that area now.

We must send them there, so they can’t attack us here.

It is clear what we must do. Our nation has been attacked by the radical Islamic terrorists of the Supreme Court. We must find them, lock them up, and try them before a military tribunal. Perhaps after our Glorious President has had the chance to hand pick an entire court, America will be safe again. Until then, we must move on. America will never forget the events of 6-29, but we cannot allow them to ruin our lives. America must band together, except for the liberals and the homosexuals, and press on towards a glorious future.

Amen.

17 Comments:

At June 29, 2006 11:50 PM, Anonymous Red Blooded God Fearing American Male said...

I always thought there was something "odd" about that Roberts fella.

 
At June 30, 2006 1:45 AM, Blogger Rhesus Pieces said...

Well at least the prisoners can be held until the end of the war on terror. That can be a long sentence. That is a Geneva convention rule. They don't have to be released until hostility ends. Go to Gitmo and tell them they have all been sentenced to life by the SCOTUS. Great post Herman.

 
At June 30, 2006 4:55 PM, Blogger Herman B. Hayes said...

red blooded god fearing american male: Yes, there is something odd. Roberts is a little sissy.

rhesus pieces: That is the nice thing about the War on Terror. It never really needs to end, does it?

 
At June 30, 2006 5:01 PM, Anonymous Conservative Patriot said...

I have to agree-those three cowards are irredeemably tainted just for the act of continuing to sit on that Court. The only way to restore the Supreme Court to the role God had in mind for it is to clean it out and start all over. Perhaps Roberts would be releasable some day, after some firm lessons on what the word "honor" really means.

 
At June 30, 2006 6:08 PM, Blogger Herman B. Hayes said...

conservative patriot: I have to agree with you there. We cannot have sworn members of Al Qaeda in our Supreme Court.

 
At June 30, 2006 7:57 PM, Blogger StockOperator said...

I can only imagine how terrible our Great President must feel to have years of work aimed at keeping us safe wiped away in a single day by that vile Supreme Court. What a courageous President we have. There is no doubt in my mind that he would sacrifice his own life to save ours.

 
At June 30, 2006 10:31 PM, Anonymous dances with beagles said...

Thankfully, our glorious and God fearing Leader is smarter than all nine of these terrorists put together. Just as with so-called laws passed by the Al-Qaeda cult known as "Congress" are set aside with signing statements, our Beloved President can simply sest aside this cult's edicts also. By executive order, the guests can be tried in a court of law adhering to the Supreme Court's decision, but only if the judge and jurors are members of the military appointed by the President or someone he designates, and no defense witnesses are allowed in the court room.

 
At July 01, 2006 2:49 AM, Anonymous William Buford Beauregard III said...

Why do we even have a "Supreme" Court at all? Isn't they only supreme court we need to worry about is the one God will conduct as we stand at the gates of heaven? God is the only chief justice.

Besides, we elect a god-fearing President, but we don't get to elect the Justices. Our righteous leader President George W. Bush should not have to answer to a bunch of sissies wearing robes.

 
At July 02, 2006 1:45 AM, Blogger KILROY_60 said...

There was a television program on tonight talking about how people are going to either of the far ends fo the spectrum and keeping company only with those that share their beliefs. There is no exchange of ideas going on....no debate. This is leading America down a path none of us want to go. It's time we come together and thrive...not stay apart and merely survive. (One man's view)

Published a new post today that includes a link to you in the current (2nd) installment of A Hitchhiker's Guide To The Blogosphere. Have a great holiday.

Kilroy_60
www.KilroyFearAndLoathing.blogspot.com
With Liberty And Justice For All...

 
At July 02, 2006 1:02 PM, Blogger Liberal Liberator said...

You should note that the majority on the Court should not be expected to shift until Stevens either croaks or retires (either one will be fine). Roberts replaced Rhenquist, a staunch conservative, and Alito replaced O' Conner, sometimes a conservative and sometimes not.

Right now there are 4 liberals: Stevens, Souter, Bader-Ginsberg, Breyer; 1 moderate swing vote: Kennedy; and 4 conservatives: Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts

I have to disagree with you about Ginsberg being weak, she is the biggest radical on the Court since Brennen, and has done some serious damage to our great nation. If anyone could have been convinced it would have been Kennedy

 
At July 02, 2006 4:17 PM, Blogger Herman B. Hayes said...

The Supreme Court failed to agree with a sitting President. That is all that needs to be said on this matter. They are traitors.

 
At July 02, 2006 10:12 PM, Blogger Laurie said...

The terrorist-loving bastards! Why don't they just send Michael Moore to Gitmo with the keys, American visas, and FEMA debit cards good for $2,500 for all of these jihadists?

 
At July 06, 2006 3:10 PM, Blogger dusty said...

How dare those asshats in the long black dresses not give our president his due? The nerve...

 
At July 06, 2006 4:13 PM, Blogger Herman B. Hayes said...

laurie: Good to see you have come around. Everyone understands our path, in time.

 
At July 11, 2006 10:26 AM, Blogger Laurie said...

Herman, I have seen the light and moved toward it.

 
At December 29, 2008 1:49 AM, Blogger sexy said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,A片,視訊聊天室,聊天室,視訊,視訊聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,上班族聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,視訊交友網a片,a片


免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,A片,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛

A片,色情,成人,做愛,情色文學,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,言情小說,愛情小說,AIO,AV片,A漫,avdvd,聊天室,自拍,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,色情A片,SEX,成人論壇

情趣用品,A片,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,色情網站,免費AV,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,成人影片,情色網


情趣用品,A片,免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,臺灣情色網,色情,情色電影,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,麗的色遊戲,情色論壇,色情網站,一葉情貼圖片區,做愛,性愛,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,美女交友,做愛影片

av,情趣用品,a片,成人電影,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟

情趣用品.A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,色情遊戲,色情網站,聊天室,ut聊天室,豆豆聊天室,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,免費A片,日本a片,a片下載,線上a片,av女優,av,成人電影,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,成人網站,自拍,尋夢園聊天室

 
At August 03, 2009 4:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

酒店喝酒

酒店消費

喝花酒

粉味

暑假打工

寒假打工

酒店經紀人

酒店現領

禮服店

酒店小姐

酒店兼職

台北酒店上班

台北酒店兼職

禮服店

酒店上班

酒店打工

台北酒店小姐

酒店經紀

酒店兼差

假日打工

台北酒店經紀

酒店經紀公司

酒店午場

酒店規定

酒店行政

酒店資訊

酒店藝名

台北酒店

酒店日保

 

Post a Comment

<< Home